May 2005
Like many Americans, we plan to spend this Memorial Day relaxing with friends. As good and proper an activity as that is, we would be wrong not to recognize the true purpose of this holiday. Those who have given the last full measure of devotion to our country died for more substantial freedoms than a three-day weekend.

Here is some information on Memorial Day by the Department of Veterans' Affairs.

And here is a link to our Veterans' Day tribute to all who have laid their lives on the line for our country, including two family members who died in World War I.
posted by sursumcorda on Monday, May 30, 2005 at 07:26 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Random Musings
Who wouldn't want to be smarter, think more clearly, and be able to concentrate better? New Scientist has compiled a list of brain-building suggestions for everyone from students to senior citizens.  Some were new to me, some old hat, some intriguing, and some frightening:
  • Drugs  This is a scary one.  Modafinil, officially prescribed to treat narcolepsy, keeps healthy people awake and alert on little sleep.  Students wanting an extra edge on exams are taking Ritalin for its concentration-enhancing effects.  No matter how much it's claimed that the drugs are not harmful, I'm extremely skeptical.  But if athletes will sacrifice their future for a little present glory, taking metabolic steroids despite the known risk, can performance-enhanced SAT scores be far behind?
  • Food  We've heard most of this before:  Eat a protein-rich breakfast; they suggest beans or Marmite on whole grain toast, but perhaps we could get away with peanut butter.  Throughout the day emphsize fiber (improved cognition), B-vitamins (brain-boosters), eggs and yogurt (for building neurotransmitters),  colorful fruits and vegetables (antioxidants), and fish (brain-enhancing omega-3 fatty acids).  Avoid brain-fouling trans fats.
  • Music  The jury is still out on the Mozart Effect, but the brain-boosting benefits of music lessons are clear.
  • Mental Workouts  Exercises for improving memory help other parts of the brain as well.
  • Physical Workouts  Regular exercise promotes brain growth and reduces brain-damaging stress homones.  Aerobic exercise, sedate walking, and yoga have all shown significant benefit.
  • Sleep  Just what Mom always said:  If you don't get enough sleep, that extra studying is a waste of time.  Not only does sleep improve attention and concentration, but it gives the brain a chance to work in ways it can't when you're awake.  Sometimes a problem really can be solved by "sleeping on it."
  • Not for Children Only  Contrary to what we were all told, even adults can grow new brain cells.
  • Strange but True?  You might have more brain power than you think.  Volunteers in one study increased the strength of their biceps by 13% after 12 weeks of spending 15 minutes a day just thinking about exercising.  And neurofeedback, related to biofeedback, has enabled some people to use their brains in surprising ways, from improving musical technique, to reducing pain, to treating ADHD.
  • Attitude A healthy brain is only one of the benefits of a positive, happy outlook on life.
posted by sursumcorda on Saturday, May 28, 2005 at 02:40 PM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
Back in the old days, when corportate headquarters was on One Mustard Street in Rochester, New York, Porter worked for the R. T. French Company. That was when we discovered their Cattlemen's Barbecue Sauce. When we moved to Florida, this delicious condiment became difficult, and later impossible, to find. Soon we couldn't find it even on our periodic trips north for essential supplies, such as the famous Sassy Sauce from Sal's Birdland (Buffalo Wings are nothing compared to what they do with chicken in Rochester); Blenheim Old #3 Ginger Ale (an essential ingredient in a Lime Daley, this fabulous drink was once lost to the world but now can be found at the otherwise obnoxious South of the Border tourist trap), and white birch beer (good old Undina White Birch Beer from Higganum, Connecticut is no longer available, but now and then you can find source that understands the best birch beer isn't red).

So what did we do without our Cattlemen's? I tried one alternative brand of barbecue sauce after another; I even tried making my own. Several were good, nothing was what I remembered. Perhaps my memory was fooling me, as it often does, and Cattlemen's wasn't really that good. Or so I reasoned, until we went to a commercial barbecue (put on by our credit union, of all things!) and with my first bite, I exclaimed, "This is IT!" Come to find out, from the cooks, that they were indeed using Cattlemen's, which was still available to restaurants.

Yesterday I walked into our local Albertsons grocery store, and what did I see staring at me from the condiment aisle, boldly proclaiming itself amongst all pretenders? Cattlemen's! Once again in retail sizes. Not only the two I remembered, the original ("Award Winning Classic") and the Smoky ("Authentic Smokehouse"), but also a new variety, "Golden Honey." I snatched up one bottle of each, and am looking forward to assuring myself that the quality has returned along with the name.
posted by sursumcorda on Friday, May 27, 2005 at 09:48 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Reviews
For those of you to whom this matters, I've added syndication links (RSS, etc.) to the right-hand panel. I'm a complete novice here, but I know that there are various programs out there that you can use with this to let you know when certain websites are updated. SharpReader was recommended to me, though I haven't tried it yet because I have to install the .Net framework first, and I just haven't bothered. For now, the Live Bookmark option in FireFox works pretty well.
posted by sursumcorda on Thursday, May 26, 2005 at 01:30 PM
Permalink | Comments
Category Computing
Research has shown, once again, that the human body works best when used according to its original design. A study of more than 2000 nine to fifteen year olds indicates that exclusive breastfeeding significantly lowers systolic blood pressure, with the strength of the benefit directly proportional to the duration of the breastfeeding. This positive effect is comparable to that of exercise and of restricted salt diets in adults.
posted by sursumcorda on Tuesday, May 24, 2005 at 08:09 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
Just off the Georgetown Pike (Route 193) in McLean, Virginia, right across from the CIA, you can step back in time to 1771 at the Claude Moore Colonial Farm. This living history museum is small enough, and inexpensive enough, to make a great "rest stop" for travellers along the frenetic I-95 corridor. Our most recent visit coincided with one of their Market Fairs, and we thoroughly enjoyed seeing the exhibits, eating the "18th century" food, and chatting with a remarkable wandering Gypsy fortune teller. I had always associated Gypsies with Europe, but learned that many came to Virginia, particularly after being told that being Gypsy and being Scottish had become mutually exclusive.
posted by sursumcorda on Monday, May 23, 2005 at 10:13 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Reviews
I have an eight year old friend who is a self-proclaimed vegetarian ("I don't like meat"), although this is not entirely accurate, since he eats both bacon and chicken nuggets. When his aunt tried to serve him some chicken on the grounds that he likes chicken nuggets, he insisted, "There is no chicken in chicken nuggets." He may be on to something.
posted by sursumcorda on Monday, May 23, 2005 at 08:18 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Everyday Life
When God created the sun, He called it good. In recent years we have been told that God was wrong. Doctors—and hence parents, especially mothers—have been insisting that we dare not venture out into the sunshine without the protection of clothing and/or lavishly applied sunscreen. Living in Florida, I have a highly-developed sense of respect for the power of the sun's rays, and certainly do my share in supporting the sunscreen industry. But I also remember my mother's insistence on the importance of sunshine on skin for making much-needed vitamin D. Thus it was heartening to read that evidence is mounting in favor of my mother (not to mention God).

Not that anyone is recommending we go back to the days of frying ourselves on the beaches. Our overuse of sunscreen, however, may actually be causing more cancer than it prevents. Vitamin D, it turns out, plays an important role in preventing and fighting certain cancers, particularly colon cancer—and even skin cancer itself. Not only are we not getting enough vitamin D in our diets, as a rule, but the supplemental vitamin D we do receive (in milk and vitamin supplements) is not as good as the vitamin D made through the collaboration of skin and sun.

So—heed my mother's warning: Respect the sun, limit your exposure, but never forget that fresh air, exercise, and sunshine provide some of life's best medicine. (Turn off the TV and go play outside!)
posted by sursumcorda on Sunday, May 22, 2005 at 08:36 PM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
While the United States is busy wrestling with the so-called right to die, in the United Kingdom it's the right to life that is in question. Leslie Burke, who has a degenerative brain disease, has won a court judgement forbidding doctors to withdraw nutrition and hydration should the time come when he needs them and is incapable of expressing his wishes. The government is challenging the decision, claiming that doctors, not patients, should be the final arbiters of treatment decisions. Nor do they make any attempt to disguise their financial concerns, for under socialized medicine, leaving the power to "pull the plug" in the hands of those who wish to continue to live can get very expensive for the government.

Consider these statements:

  • The health department claimed that if a right to artificial nutrition or hydration (ANH) treatment was established, patients would be able to demand other life-prolonging treatments
  • [The government argued that the ruling] may be interpreted as giving patients the right to demand certain treatments, contrary to the considered judgment of their medical team, that would lead to patients obtaining access to treatment that is not appropriate for them, and to inefficient (and unfairly skewed) use of resources within the NHS
  • [and also that the ruling] had led to a confusion between the roles of doctor and patient—the decision over treatment [is] for the doctor, not the patient

In the words of Mr. Burke's lawyer, "The key issue could be summarised in two words: who decides?" It's not an easy issue, and it won't go away. I remember a conversation with an anesthesiologist friend 25 years ago, in which he warned that health care resources are not infinite and like it or not we will have to make decisions as to how they are allocated. A capitalist system, in which money provides access to health care, seems at first to be monstrously unfair, but I'll take its flexibility any day over socialized medicine, in which life and death decisions—still made on an economic basis; that's unavoidable—are in the hands of an inhuman, faceless bureaucracy. When decisions are left up to individuals and smaller institutions, creativity and compassion have room to flourish. People can cut back in other areas of their budgets to provide for medical care; families and communities can unite to raise funds; deals can be worked out. A friend of ours who never had medical insurance needed a quadruple heart bypass operation. The hospital asked him to pay his $150,000 bill of at a rate of $100/month. He won't live long enough to pay it off, but this solution pleased both him and the hospital. The more decisions are left at a local level, the more flexibility we have.

One thing I know: I agree with Mr. Burke that I don't want a doctor, a lawyer, a judge, or anyone else who doesn't know me extremely well deciding that my "quality of life" isn't worth living.
posted by sursumcorda on Thursday, May 19, 2005 at 08:08 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
The statistics for this blog tell me that I have had over 1400 unique visitors so far. Since only a handful have left comments, it leaves me wondering who you all are. I know the number is inflated, because it only counts IP addresses, and often the same person comes back with a slightly different address. I also know that a number of the visits are from faceless robots. But surely some of them represent real people.

Most of the vistors have been from the United States, but others have come from Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Bahamas, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia, the European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Luxembourg, Macau, Malaysia, Mexico, Namibia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, the Philippines, Poland, Puerto Rico, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Syria, Taiwan, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela, and Vietnam! I might be able to account for Italy, Hong Kong, and New Zealand as well as a few from the U.S., but who are the rest of you? How did you find my blog? Are you a one-time visitor, or do you check in regularly? What do you like, or not like? Please leave a comment and let me know. You don't have to identify yourself; just let me know you are a real person! I certainly hope that most of my "readers" aren't just robots.
posted by sursumcorda on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 04:51 PM
Permalink | Comments
Category Computing
Sometimes I like the Frazz comic because of its references to things that have meaning to me but are relatively obscure (like the trebuchet), and sometimes I like Frazz because it mentions things I know nothing about myself. The reference to David Mamet in today's strip inspired a Google search that led me to this Salon interview. Movies, television, and modern culture being an alien landscape to me, I have not seen any of Mamet's films, but the interview reveals—and conceals—a character so interesting I'm inclined to change that.
posted by sursumcorda on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 08:59 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Reviews
Parents in Rochester, New York no longer have to stay home with sick children, nor be inconvenienced by having to take them to the doctor, thanks to a program that connects schools and day care centers with doctors via the Internet. Little Johnny wakes up feeling miserable? No need to fret; just pack him off to school or day care anyway. There, a staff member with a whole week's worth of training will examine his ears, swab his throat, and otherwise check him out using equipment that sends the results over the Internet to a physician. The diagnosis is made, medication begun, and you pick your child up at the end of the day as usual, no fuss, no bother.

The good news is that if a day care worker can wield the equipment after a week of training, so can a parent. When our children were young we were blessed with a doctor who respected our powers of observation and judgment; he spared us many unnecessary trips to his office by dealing with minor problems over the telephone. Although few doctors these days are so accommodating, perhaps this new equipment will make them feel more comfortable with trusting their patients.

For the most part, however, I don't think this development is worthy of the enthusiasm with which it is being received.

  • 92 percent of parents said the hassle-free option allowed them to stay at work when they otherwise would have taken their children to a family doctor or an emergency room
This may look like good news for parents, but the only clear winners are their employers. What begins as a new option for parents will soon translate into pressure from the boss: You don't need to take your child to the doctor; let the school handle it.
  • doctors have diagnosed mostly everyday illnesses like colds, rashes, asthma, ringworm and pink eye that account for almost three-quarters of all pediatric office visits
The doctors can't really be happy about this. At the moment it's a physician at the University of Rochester who is giving the diagnosis, but you can be sure someone has already realized the job can be done less expensively by "offshoring" the work. If the diagnostic information can be sent across town, it can be sent anywhere in the world.
  • any patient with a fever or a contagious disease is sent home
Except for severe cases, you know that isn't going to happen. Do schools and day care centers really want to become infirmaries? I doubt the (temporarily) healthy teachers, children, and their families will be happy with the idea.
  • ...available where children spend the majority of their time, such as schools and child-care centers
This is the saddest line of all. Who really loses with this new technology? The children. Now even illness can't guarantee them time in their own homes, with their own families.
posted by sursumcorda on Friday, May 6, 2005 at 07:31 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
I'm am really tired of reading about procedures that were once known to be right now being shown to be useless or even harmful. Actually, I'm not tired of learning the truth, just frustrated with those (especially doctors, teachers, and governmental authorities) who are absolutely certain they know best and thus justiify runing roughshod over other people. I think of the Canadian judge who will force an unwanted medical procedure on a child, in violation of her own conscience and the desires of her family, because he and some doctors think it's the best thing for her; of those who would insist, with the force of law, that a hospital is the only acceptable place to be born, and a school the only acceptable place to be educated, despite mounting evidence to the contrary; of bloodletting, and hormone replacement therapy, and routine circumcision, all procedures once pushed by the medical profession and since retracted. Here's the latest: episiotomies, once considered essential to prevent serious problems during and after childbirth, have now been shown to be useless.

I know we must make decisions based on the knowledge we have at the time, and have no problem with honest errors. My quarrel is with those—I include myself—who in the certainty of their own convictions would use the force of law or their position to shut down contrary beliefs.

"First, do no harm."
posted by sursumcorda on Thursday, May 5, 2005 at 07:42 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
Happy Cinco de Mayo to all!
posted by sursumcorda on Thursday, May 5, 2005 at 07:21 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Everyday Life
Regular breast self exams, pap smears, mammograms, colonoscopies, prostate exams, full excision and pathological examination of moles that once were just shaved off at skin level, even routine full body scans—our understandable fear of cancer is reflected in the many procedures available and often recommended in hopes of besting this scourge.

However, there is a downside to all this screening that is now beginning to be recognized.

In an article questioning the wisdom of celebrity endorsements of cancer screening, I came upon these astonishing statements:

  • Counterintuitive as it may sound, it's sometimes better not to find out about cancer
  • Some cancers are likely to resolve themselves without treatment
  • Some patients may be likely to die of another ailment before cancer becomes an issue
  • The risk of false positives seems to increase with more screenings
  • Overdiagnosis…is an increasing problem

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has a collection of current recommendations for cancer screening, plus a lot more. I don't know anything about this organization, and in any case it is no ultimate authority, but it's a place to start.

Having known people whose lives were probably saved by cancer screening, and people whose lives were probably shortened by cancer screening, I can only conclude that life is never as simple as we want it to be.
posted by sursumcorda on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 at 08:12 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health
So today is National Teacher Day. (I know because Google told me so.) Since this blog includes rants against the terrible damage done to children and families by an inhuman and inhumane government-sponsored school system, and such private schools as seek (or are required) to emulate it, it is meet and right to make space today to recognize teaching as an honorable profession, and good teachers as incomparable treasures. The monstrosity that is school destroys teachers as well as students. In particular, today I honor:
  • All the teachers among our family and friends
  • Teachers who struggle year after year in increasingly difficult situations for the sake of making a schoolchild's day less bleak
  • Teachers who quit the system for the sake of conscience
  • Teachers who brave dismissal and lawsuits, daring to hug their students
  • Teachers who still believe that rigorous study and high achievement are important goals for everyone
  • Teachers who work with parents and not against them, respecting their values, insights, and goals
  • Students who succeed in making their education their own business, in spite of school
  • Students who take back the joy of learning and refuse to submit to school's stultifiying regimen
  • Parents who embrace their responsibilities as their children's primary teachers, exercising extreme caution when delegating any of the work to others
  • Parents who not only love but respect their children
  • All babies and very young children, who know that learning is the most fun game of all, and who excel at it, until we crush their spirits
God bless you all, on National Teacher Day and every day!
posted by sursumcorda on Tuesday, May 3, 2005 at 10:55 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Education
If this story doesn't scare you, you need to read it again. (Here's another version.) A 14-year-old Canadian girl has gone into hiding to avoid being forced to have a blood transfusion that some doctors in British Columbia believe she needs because of her cancer chemotherapy. The girl does not want the transfusion, and her parents agree with her. Whether you believe private medical decisions belong in the hands of individuals of any age, or of parents in the case of under-age children, this is a gross violation of individual and family rights by the Canadian government. Of course it's all done with the best of motives and "for her own good," but somehow that makes it even more frightening.

"The girl has gone into hiding with her family in Ontario to avoid blood transfusions that a [British Columbia] court ordered should be given."

"B.C. courts ruled the girl is capable of making a decision, but B.C. law requires that a person be 19 years or older before they are allowed to refuse lifesaving medical treatment."

"April 11 B.C. Supreme Court ruling said she couldn't refuse treatment despite her religious beliefs."

"The B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development was granted custody of the girl last week."

"All children are entitled to be protected from abuse and harm . . . the ultimate threat of harm would be death. . . her religious beliefs don't override her right to life and death."

"[An] order of apprehension issued in B.C. remains on police computers."

"We are using all of the resources available to us to make sure that we know where she is."

"An air ambulance to return her to B.C. is on standby."

Think about it.
posted by sursumcorda on Monday, May 2, 2005 at 04:45 PM
Permalink | Comments
Category Health

Hard, painstaking work is the toll an independent spirit charges itself for self-respect.

— John Taylor Gatto

posted by sursumcorda on Monday, May 2, 2005 at 07:33 AM
Permalink | Comments
Category Random Musings