Continuing my commentary on LaMonte M. Fowler's Huffington Post article. (Links to Part 1 and Part 2.)
We don’t live in a democracy. Technically we are a Federal Republic. But in reality, we are ruled by an oligarchy. If you don’t know what that is, look it up. Reading will do you good. You probably need to do more of it.
Thanks for making the point clear about a democracy. My Swiss friends, who really do live in a democracy, will be happy for more Americans to learn the difference.
I disagree about oligarchy. Our true rulers are many and diverse, though if I classify and personify them I can present it as a rule by the few. Behold, our Tredecumvirate:
- Government Bureaucracies
- Political Insiders
- Lawyers
- The Media
- Hollywood
- Madison Avenue
- All Businesses Considered Too Big to Fail
- The Educational System, from preschool to university
- Microsoft
- Apple
- Public Opinion
- Our Own Self-Centered Natures
I'm sure you can think of more, as can I, but thirteen seems a good place to stop.
I don't understand articles like that. In a blog, ok, but in a news outlet? Does Mr. Fowler really think that tone will win any converts, or even that someone who didn't know what an oligarchy was is going to actually read more just because Mr. Fowler judged him dumb and in need of reading? Or is he just saying that so the choir can smugly chortle along?
It takes an exceptional character not to dismiss advice given in contempt, but to judge it on its merits and - if beneficial - to follow it. If anyone has read Mr. Fowler's article, looked up the meaning of oligarchy, and taken steps to ensure he reads more: Please run for president. Now.
Such a person would have my vote. Not that the competition is overwhelming these days.
His last line is all we need to know: "I feel better now." That's all his writing did - make him feel better.
