It's not polite to think about items you didn't get for Christmas while we're still in the Christmas season. But hey—at least no one thinks I'm hinting for a gift as I ponder things.
Those who know me will be shocked at what I am about to reveal, almost as shocked as when I admitted that I might actually want to own a Wii. Oops, I haven't actually confessed that here yet. But I had such a blast with the Wii Fit over Thanksgiving....
I am a book-lover. That is, a lover of real, paper, take-'em anywhere, you-own-it-and-Amazon (or whoever)-can't take it away kinds of books. Books that smell like books. I dislike reading on a computer screen. Back in the Dark Ages of last century, I tried reading a book on my then-leading-edge Palm handheld device. Yuck.
However, the thought of owning an e-reader (Kindle, Nook, etc.) is slowly breaching my event horizon. For one thing, the price is coming down. I had dismissed Kindle early on, at the mere thought of holding a $300 "book" that would likely to break if dropped. But $100 is a little less scary. More than 2/3 less scary, for some reason.
Then this morning I was struck by two prods in the e-book direction. First, an e-mail from Janet inquiring about a certain book, which opened my eyes to the idea that one can give e-reader books instantly, without worrying about delivery time or overseas shipping charges.
Shortly thereafter I read Conversion Diary's 7 Quick Takes Friday, from which I quote:
My husband got me a Kindle for Christmas. “I guess I might use it for the occasional fiction book,” I thought. “But I’ll never do regular reading on an electronic device.” To put it bluntly: I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG. This thing has become like an appendage of my body. It’s my favorite gadget I’ve ever owned. Here’s what’s great about it:
- You can create highlights and make notes — and they’re available online. First of all, I was delighted to discover that you can highlight sections and make notes with e-readers. Then, when I logged into my Kindle account on Amazon and saw all my highlights and notes right there, I almost passed out from the awesomeness. (It has been pointed out to me that you can only do this with books you buy through the Kindle store. Which is definitely a downside. But whatever! Because then there’s this:)
- It lies flat. The other day the baby was unusually fussy and insisted on being held all day, and in the moments when she’d finally doze off I was able to get a lot of reading done. I had to use both hands for the ninja techniques required to keep her happy, and so it would have been hard to hold a paper book open. Being able to just glance down at my Kindle, then press a button to turn the page, made hands-free reading a breeze.
- It doesn’t require a monthly data plan. I was under the mistaken impression that you had to buy a monthly data plan in order to download books on e-readers. I was delighted to find that I can use my Kindle on my home wireless network to get my purchases.
- The screen is like reading on paper. I’m amazed at how similar the look of the screen is to a regular book: It doesn’t glow, it’s not glossy, and it’s easier to read the more light you shine on it.
I will still buy some books in paper form, but count me in as e-reading’s newest convert.
So now you’re convinced. You’re sitting in front of your computer saying, “Jen, you’re right. I thought my life was complete, but now I see that it is a mere shell of an existence compared to what it could be if I owned an e-reader. I am going to purchase a Kindle as soon as I finish reading your astoundingly insightful Quick Takes. However, I am going to go all out and get a Kindle Fire!” No. Do not do this. Go with the low-end version. Here’s why:
One of the reasons I thought I wasn’t an e-reader kind of gal is because my mom has an iPad, and I could never get into reading books on it when I’d borrow it. First of all, I don’t like reading a lot of text on glowing screens. Second, there were too many distractions: I’d sit down with the intention of getting into Scott Hahn’s latest title, but would somehow end up in a heated debate about nuts in desserts on Twitter. It was just too tempting to do something interactive like surf the web or check my email and social media accounts. What’s wonderful about the basic-model Kindle (and presumably the basic models of other e-readers as well) is that there’s no temptation to do anything other than read a book.
So, I think I was right that I don’t like reading on electronic devices; what I was missing is that the basic Kindle is more like a book than an electronic device.
So ... it's not like reading on a computer screen after all. And it seems there are lots of cool features not available with print books. It might be just the thing for books I want to read once, but which aren't good enough to merit any of our already over-taxed and precious bookshelf space. (Well ... erm ... out of curiosity I did a quick calculation of how much bookshelf space we have: Over 200 feet. That's 2/3 of a football field of books lined up along their narrowest dimension. No wonder an e-reader is beginning to sound attractive.)
What's more, you can store pictures and Word docs and text files and pdfs and mp3s. Think of all the cute grandkid photos I could take along with me.
I'm leery, however, of committing to a proprietary format. And unhappier still that the companies can apparently yank a book off your own device without your permission.
I realize I'm coming very late to the table here. After all, the Occasional CEO told me nearly three years ago that I should get one. (Actually, he told me nearly three years ago that someone else should get me one, but I digress.) So I'm throwing the question out to my more up-to-date, tech-savvy readers. What do you think? Do you own an e-reader? Why or why not? Which do you think is best?
I got the basic Kindle (without ads) a few months ago, and my preferences shifted very quickly in favor of e-books. When reading a paper book, I sometimes wish I had it on Kindle instead. I think most reading will soon shift to digital readers, but I'll still buy the occasional hardcover collector's edition for books that are better experienced that way. Or for books I want to share, if they don't make digital sharing easier.
Books ought to move to a subscription format, with a flat monthly cost for all books and compensation going to authors/publishers in proportion to actual reading that occurs.
I think you need to think about your book budget. Pretty much everything I read is borrowed (from someone or the library) or used (from book sales or hand-me-downs). So far, this doesn't work well with e-readers. Yes, the library has some, but I am guessing you will not often find what you want, and there are a bunch of free books, but again, probably not what you are looking for. If you are used to spending $10 a book, then you are all set. If you are used to paying less than $1, then you may have to increase your budget.
Which Kindle did you get, Peter? The most basic basic, the Touch, or the Keyboard? What specifically do you like about it? Do you use it for anything other than books?
Interesting idea about the subscription. I can see it as an option -- but I tend to be more of a pay-as-you-go than a pay-every-month person. (We often pay MORE per month for recycled water here, because it's a fixed fee, than for potable water, which is metered. I find that annoying.)
S, that's a good point about prices. I hadn't been paying much attention to the Kindle price of a book, since I don't have one. I did a quick check of the books languishing in my shopping cart, and found some to be unavailable on Kindle, some far cheaper on Kindle (one was free) and some MORE expensive on Kindle (explain that). But I'm not nearly as good as you at getting bargain prices, so $10 actually sounds like a reasonable price to me -- for a REAL book. It seems an electronic version should be less, just as I think a collection of mp3's should not cost as much as the same works on a CD.
That comment was from D, by the way.
I wish I could find the article I read last week. If I remember correctly, the idea that e-books should be less expensive than print books didn't really hold because the cost to print was only about 50-75 cents per book.
I think e-readers may be the best deal for people who like to read popular books as soon as they are published. My guess is these books are a bit cheaper on an e-reader. However, if your someone like me who doesn't mind waiting awhile (and who often pushes back against reading the "hot" book of the month), I think the prices even out and eventually you would be able to get the print version cheaper.
But, I also think that for you, some of the features you have described make it worth the price. (Assuming you would have bought the books anyway, and that they are available in e-book form).
I got the basic one with no keyboard, no touch, no distractions. I like the e-ink display. Though it's not quite up to the standard of paper, it's a very different feel vs. backlit screens. I don't really use for anything but serial reading. I use Instapaper to send long articles from the web to my Kindle so I can read them later.
About pricing... Right when I bought my Kindle, I also bought some paperbacks because they were less than the $10 Kindle price, but found myself wishing I had the Kindle edition instead. But I still can't bring myself to pay *more* for an e-book (unless it's a reference work where being able to search, etc. adds value).
I'm wondering if the highlighting and notes would make it worthwhile for a high school student. Allowing them to take notes and highlight as they read, and as Peter mentioned, doing searches.
Something to consider.
S
Hmm, I'm currently annoyed with Amazon. I was rather impressed by the Kindle Touch, for its larger capacity and its ability to handle audio books and mp3's. But a look at the fine print shows that the $99 price tag they tout is NOT a "special offer" but comes WITH "special offers," a poor euphemism for "advertisements." It's a bit much to expect me to watch ads on a device I paid for -- much like commercials on cable TV and t-shirts with the designer's name prominently displayed. Somehow $140 sounds a lot more unreasonable than $100. And for the basic version, $110 does not have the eye-catching appeal of $80.
